WOW Branding

names + identities for the brave
  • Home
  • About WOW
  • Get Branded
  • Portfolio
  • Process
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact
Call Now: 1-866-969-2726 TOLL-FREE 

Get Started with WOW!

  • HeadStart Form: Questions for Brand Development. Your responses to these questions will jump-start the branding process and allow us to prepare for the next step. Learn more ›

Quick Links

  • Get Branded: It's Time to Get Branded on Purpose Learn more ›
  • Top 5 frustrations of a CEO: Learn more ›
  • BSI: How does your brand measure up internally? Test your internal brand strength with our BSI. Learn more ›

Feature

WOW Writes the Book on Branding. With case studies from around the world, this book is indispensable for those considering launching a new brand or revitalizing an existing one. Check out the book on Amazon.com ›››

Bookmark and Share


We'd love to tell you that branding is all about pretty design but we'd be lying. It takes balls to define your leadership, clarity and focus, and you'll need even bigger balls to execute on it. The branding process can reveal a bunch of ugliness as well as brilliance. Yes, branding hurts. Are you brave enough?  Get a regular shot of qualified comments, opinions, recommendations, tools, and ideas regarding branding and leadership. To inspire and provide food for thought.  Welcome to our blog!


Packaging vs. Product

Dann Ilicic - Friday, April 24, 2009
I'm sure that most of you have seen the Susan Boyle/Britain's Got Talent video by now on YouTube. I saw it last week when the views were fewer than 10 million and it has already surpassed 40 million. If you haven't seen it yet, please check it out - it will make your day.

The video got me thinking about how important it is to have a good product and that ultimately product is more important than packaging. So much of marketing is based on inflated claims that it is nice to find something genuine and authentic - like Susan Boyle.

I'm not saying that packaging isn't important - it certainly is. My point is that when companies put more emphasis on their packaging (marketing claims) than their product, it creates the disappointment we've all experienced. When it comes to brand building, we coach our clients to remember that the brand is made up of two parts: first, your ability to create an authentic, compelling and differentiating promise (package) that people give a shit about; and second, your ability to organize yourself around the delivery of that promise. I think we can all agree that Susan certainly delivered.

How's your promise and delivery doing? Are they aligned? Are you sure?
Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink | Blog Home

Trackback Link
http://www.wowbranding.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2562&PostID=38797&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Ryan Parker commented on 28-Apr-2009 07:16 AM
I had the same experience with a carpet cleaning product called "Folex". I think the reason I noticed it on the shelf among the pretty bottles was the fact that it was so simple, "undesigned" and, therefore, different. The branding guy in me thought "now there's a company with confidence in their product...let's give it a try." I ended up buying a couple of products, and Folex was the only one that worked on a full glass of red wine on white carpet. Packaging matters. But that doesn't mean it has to look like everything else.

Post a Comment




Captcha Image

Your product failed – and I love it!

Peter Andersen - Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Low expectations are fertile ground for growing brand loyalty.

Companies spend a lot of money creating awareness and desire for their brands. Building positive expectations before the purchase. And so they should.

But here’s the catch, if the company fulfills its promise (price, service, quality, etc.) it merely lives up to what is already expected from its customer base. The customer is satisfied, but is not turned into a raving fan, passionately promoting the experience and the brand to anyone who cares to listen. There’s not a lot of brand equity to win by just doing what’s expected.

Now, at some point most products or services (if not all..) will fail in some area. Or, to put it in brand lingo terms, the product does not live up to its brand promise; the battery on your Mac laptop suddenly dies, the air-condition in your Toyota goes cold, the concierge at your hotel forgets to give you that wake-up call.

Not only is that annoying in itself, but the process of fixing the problem is in most cases the real pain in the...

For instance, your 14 month old vacuum cleaner sucks.. and not the way it’s supposed to. The mouth piece breaks in two and all you can do is vacuum small circular areas the size of a golf ball.
Now, subconsciously you’ve already gone through the scenario: Trying to find a relevant phone number on the manufacturer’s website, figuring out the specific part number, navigating through their phone maze, shipping the broken piece and finally getting the new part delivered straight to your front door - when you are not at home. In other words, you expect an experience you could do without.

And, this is where the opportunity is. The vacuum cleaner manufacturer has a perfect occasion to turn you into a raving fan of the brand by having a post-sales system in place that eliminates those steps mentioned above. Simply because you don’t expect to be wow’ed.

Here’s an example from my own world. I recently had a new faucet installed in my kitchen. About six months later the shower head (yes, it came with that..) didn’t work and I was immediately dreading an experience similar to the vacuum cleaner spiel. But to my great surprise, and relief, it turned out to be a completely hassle-free experience. No sending parts back and forth, no trying to find the receipt or arguing that it was covered by warranty. Just a quick phone call to a very nice sales person, and three days later the part was delivered to my home at a scheduled time.

I had never heard of this particular brand before, had no emotional connection to it, even though I use the faucet every day. But the fact that it broke down, or rather, the fact that Pegasus (for that is it’s name) had a system in place that completely wiped out my (negative) expectations, and transformed me from a brand ignorant to a brand evangelist for the company. No marketing dollars they could have spend, could have placed the brand so effectively on my short list as this post-sales system taking advantage of my pre-conceived, negative, expectations.

And next time I, or anyone I know, need a product within their range, you bet I’ll be a passionate Pegasus brand evangelist. The product failed, the brand prevailed.
Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink | Blog Home

Trackback Link
http://www.wowbranding.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2562&PostID=37206&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Anonymous commented on 30-Mar-2009 03:31 PM
Good article, Interesting how customer service staff can be brand ambassadors and can make or break a brand.

Post a Comment




Captcha Image

Where do good company names come from

Dann Ilicic - Monday, April 20, 2009
There seems to be a lot of mystery about how great new brand names are created and where they come from. I read articles on how extensive name testing is done and how professional linguists help guarantee success and it drives me nuts. Take a look at this Wikipedia link on the etymology of some of the world's most recognizable brands to see where their names came from. My favorite one is the story of Kinko's.

When I talk to our clients and colleagues about naming, I often warn them about the biggest naming mistake they can make. It has been my experience that when discussing name ideas with a room full of bright, educated and driven people, they will generally gravitate towards a descriptive name because it "says what we do". Although this may seem like good logic at first, it really is flawed. First of all, descriptive names are by definition next to impossible to trademark. Second, they are generic and forgettable—the exact opposite of your brand should be.

One of my core beliefs is that names are made great by having an authentic, compelling and consistent brand promise behind them. My favorite names are those that reflect core values, character and/or positioning of the company in an interesting, not immediately obvious way. I also believe the you need to have balls to do this. The irony being that playing it safe can actually be dangerous for your brand.

So here's the bottom line. Great names can come from anywhere and they do. The real issue is will you know it when you see it. This is the time to be brave. If your name doesn't make you at least a little nervous, keep looking—you're still playing with the obvious.

Feel free to use some of our naming tools for yourself by clicking here.

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink | Blog Home

Trackback Link
http://www.wowbranding.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2562&PostID=37182&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Gustavo Cadar commented on 29-Apr-2009 07:13 AM
Very interesting article. Indeed, descriptive names flood in naming brainstorms and usually are the favorites to the companies owners, since they tend to be very conservatives choosing names. I try to persuade them to use those descriptions (if needed) as tag lines. That help them to understand that their brand core is not exactly what they do, but it is more like HOW they do what they do.
Jen Ohs - VA graphic design commented on 21-Oct-2009 11:08 AM
Great post. It certainly has me thinking about my corporate name which recently came under review. I like the idea of the name "making you nervous". I've found that the same goes for great design - which goes hand-in-hand with branding of course.

Post a Comment




Captcha Image


Previous 1 Next

Recent Posts

  • Our Canadian Brand Essence - By Andrea Shillington
  • Brand over-protection inspires creative abuse
  • Whose Differentiation strategy is better: PC or MAC
  • My date with branding.
  • Is Bing a good name for Microsoft's search offering?
  • Cause for a good business
  • Understanding why we buy—Words Matter
  • Queensland 1, Alberta 0
  • Packaging vs. Product
  • Your product failed – and I love it!

Tags

Positioning PR psychology Differentiation Brand loyalty online brands, commodity brands Packaging Competitive Advantage Branding Hurts, blog brand promise Vision & Purpose naming a company Creativity
  • Brand loyalty (6)
  • brand promise (6)
  • Branding Hurts, blog (2)
  • Competitive Advantage (1)
  • Creativity (2)
  • Differentiation (1)
  • naming a company (2)
  • online brands, commodity brands (1)
  • Packaging (1)
  • Positioning (1)
  • PR (2)
  • psychology (2)
  • Vision & Purpose (2)

Archive

  • March 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • August 2009 (1)


RSS
Subscription

Twitter

LinkedIn



WOW Branding testimonials

Video: WOW Branding testimonials
Things we are proud of. Click to watch the video.





Twitter | LinkedIn

COPYRIGHT 2008 WOW BRANDING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.